Druid ascendcy is bad working.

"

Kaiserblade42#2817 เขียน:

I've been playing games for over 40 years.

I created a druid in the league, but I found it more appropriate to play outside the league, as I want to understand the druid more quickly and comprehensively.

Up to this point, I've liked the druid (wolf); the melee damage is good and productive, as is the elemental damage.

But there are two things I didn't understand, and I suppose this is poor development:

1- The Oracle Ascendancy: Where are the buffs for SS and their wolves? I looked closely, and looked again, it's hair-raising... what's so difficult for you to understand that a player who plays melee with a wolf, therefore the Oracle SS, needs a more animalistic ascendancy? What you did is, at the very least, a total out-of-touch mistake; it seems you were thinking of something else... or perhaps you really need to look at what you're putting in your cup of tea.

2- Equipment.

So... why can't the druid use off-hand combat? Being a melee character, they're exposed to damage all the time, so why can't the SS druid use off-hand combat regardless of the skill? I don't want to play using spells with a druid, I want to play melee.

In other posts, I said, or rather, I kindly asked, that you stop manipulating how the player wants to play, and instead, you should focus more on the quality of combat and the proportions of damage, life, and defense.

This Oracle Ascension thing is a total lack of creativity. I'm not being rude. I'm just saying what I think.

"

Kaiserblade42#2817 เขียน:

This Oracle Ascension thing is a total lack of creativity. I'm not being rude. I'm just saying what I think.

"

Prügelprinz#6281 เขียน:

"

Kaiserblade42#2817 เขียน:

This Oracle Ascension thing is a total lack of creativity. I'm not being rude. I'm just saying what I think.

LOL. Oracle is one of the most interactive and creative ascendancies in the game right now. The realization of theme and gameplay is impeccable.

"

Kaiserblade42#2817 เขียน:

so, wheres the SS buffs then???. what i see is the total opposite of that.