Auction House when?

+1

"

Die_Scream#5464 เขียน:

Trading doesn't have to suck, be filled with scams, and take up a ridiculous amount of your gaming time. Answer: AH.

Let's go!

This will NEVER happen. Just wont.

"

Vzwson#6959 เขียน:

"

Die_Scream#5464 เขียน:

Trading doesn't have to suck, be filled with scams, and take up a ridiculous amount of your gaming time. Answer: AH.

Let's go!

This will NEVER happen. Just wont.

Why are you so certain about that? I really can't understand what it is about the current system that seems to be enjoyed and defended by many in place of a simple AH.

"

Grikanna#2569 เขียน:

"

Vzwson#6959 เขียน:

"

Die_Scream#5464 เขียน:

Trading doesn't have to suck, be filled with scams, and take up a ridiculous amount of your gaming time. Answer: AH.

Let's go!

This will NEVER happen. Just wont.

Why are you so certain about that? I really can't understand what it is about the current system that seems to be enjoyed and defended by many in place of a simple AH.

Because Jonathan is very stuck in his vision and ways. I don't think hes willing to adapt to the communities requests. He's made it clear.

No it didn't

Explaining why we don't want one, wont have one... is like explaining it to a toddler, you tell him no and hold firm to the no and they run off crying.

I make more money with no AH then I would with a AH so there is why I say no.

"

Vzwson#6959 เขียน:

"

Die_Scream#5464 เขียน:

Trading doesn't have to suck, be filled with scams, and take up a ridiculous amount of your gaming time. Answer: AH.

Let's go!

This will NEVER happen. Just wont.

There is absolutely no excuse for GGG not implementing a similar system. This is pure cowardice. We must be able to trade instantly, properly, without scams, without wasting an eternity searching for items, and without being forced to sit in front of our computers like idiots just to sell something. It is unacceptable that we are still stuck with this outdated, clunky, and player-hostile system. A fair, efficient, and respectable trade system is not a luxury—it is a necessity. GGG needs to stop ignoring this issue and deliver a system that treats players like human beings, not like desperate scavengers.

"

iniquitouslegion#7086 เขียน:

Explaining why we don't want one, wont have one... is like explaining it to a toddler, you tell him no and hold firm to the no and they run off crying.

I make more money with no AH then I would with a AH so there is why I say no.

To be honest you can't say that with any degree of certainty as there is no AH to compare it with.
Would you stop playing if there was an in game AH introduced? I ask because I get the impression some (can't predict numbers of course) players will not play or return in the future if there is not an AH.

"

iniquitouslegion#7086 เขียน:

Explaining why we don't want one, wont have one... is like explaining it to a toddler, you tell him no and hold firm to the no and they run off crying.

I make more money with no AH then I would with a AH so there is why I say no.

Make more money? RMT? So.. it's just open now? not even the pretense that this isn't an RMT game?

+1