[3.10] Bashtart's SPARK INQUISITOR * farming like a god! :)

"
grunklestank13 เขียน:
Can anyone speak to the tankyness of this build? I know the OP includes verbiage about layered defenses (should a mob not die on freeze), but I really don't see any layered defenses to speak of built into this build. No passives, no gear, etc. Can someone help me understand?

I am trying to roll a "tanky boss killer", and I'm really tired of going all-in on builds advertised as such, only to hit 80 (with the right gear, yes) and realize they are squishy af and I've wasted my time & currency :(

it is not a tanky bosskiller
"
grunklestank13 เขียน:
Can anyone speak to the tankyness of this build? I know the OP includes verbiage about layered defenses (should a mob not die on freeze), but I really don't see any layered defenses to speak of built into this build. No passives, no gear, etc. Can someone help me understand?

I am trying to roll a "tanky boss killer", and I'm really tired of going all-in on builds advertised as such, only to hit 80 (with the right gear, yes) and realize they are squishy af and I've wasted my time & currency :(

I wouldn't recommend this build as a boss killer.
Yes, I cleared my first ever UE (2 sets of portals) with this in 3.5 weeks of total playtime (2 of which were in synthesis), but imo the real test is in delve bosses (since you have only 1 life there).
So far I have been unable to kill any delve bosses whatsoever with this build, even tho I have 1m shaper dps, 4.8k life and 1.4k ES when I gear for it.

Under the defensive section, the following quote can be found:
"
CWDT (lvl 2) + Immortal Call (lvl 4) + Enfeeble (lvl 6)
This setup helps us to avoid getting oneshotted and in boss fight it necessary for sustain and helps a lot to survive!

CWDT + Molten Shell + Summon Lightning Golem

This does not account for the immortal call nerf at all. Nowadays you need endurance charges for IC to be useful, and the build does not (reliably) generate endurance charges, ESPECIALLY in boss fights.
For mobbing, legion, etc. The build does not struggle because the enemy does indeed die or freeze before you do, assuming you have some projectile speed (~70%).
In general tho, I would not recommend this build to kill bosses, and I wouldn't even recommend this build unless you're league starting. If you have the resources, the truth is that you should just pick another skill and get a build for that, preferably one from poe.ninja.
I found it a very enjoyable league starter, but this is the only build I've ever played.
That said, if you do decide to run this for glacier farming or other, run arc instead. It'll give you a 10% more dps increase without any further changes to the build, and it is so much better than spark at glacier farming.

TL;DR: In my experience this build will properly beat the shit out of all content you can throw at it, apart from delve bosses. It's a good allrounder, but if you have a specific goal in mind, spark is not the gem to do it with.
แก้ไขล่าสุดโดย Iterniam#2407 เมื่อ 13 ก.ค. 2019 12:37:39
Anyone have any ideas on what my next upgrade should be?


แก้ไขล่าสุดโดย turkeyguy0#1624 เมื่อ 13 ก.ค. 2019 20:28:50
"
turkeyguy0 เขียน:
Anyone have any ideas on what my next upgrade should be?




spark lvl 21 with 20% quality for a start

then shield and wand also get a helm with enchantment get rid of that forbidden taste garbage and get max roll ele to chaos atziri flask , craft damage on ur belt instead of armour


anticurse flask , quicksilver with speed roll , remove that faster casting and replace with spell echo
แก้ไขล่าสุดโดย Vaikisss#3500 เมื่อ 14 ก.ค. 2019 19:06:50
My numbers show me, while a little less DPS
Are better. Is this wrong?
"
Vaikisss เขียน:
"
turkeyguy0 เขียน:
Anyone have any ideas on what my next upgrade should be?




spark lvl 21 with 20% quality for a start

then shield and wand also get a helm with enchantment get rid of that forbidden taste garbage and get max roll ele to chaos atziri flask , craft damage on ur belt instead of armour


anticurse flask , quicksilver with speed roll , remove that faster casting and replace with spell echo


Wow, I missed a lot of stuff... almost a miracle that I'm as far along as I am.

Shield and wand are out of the question at the moment, budget doesn't allow for upgrading these currently, only working with 2ex right now.

haven't gotten damage from leo yet for the belt, I think this is my next move asap.

forgot all about the atziri flask.

Thanks a bunch for all the suggestions!




So I'm bouncing around some T16s no problem, maybe the occasional death from Legions but I feel like I've plateaued at 256k DPS in tooltip.

I got about 20EX to work with, any recommendations? Thank you for all the input earlier @Valkis it helped quite a bit.
Hi there,

Nice build, enjoying it. Quick question, why controlled destruction on spark if we play crit ? Is there a better option ?

Ty
"
SorakaFlocka เขียน:




So I'm bouncing around some T16s no problem, maybe the occasional death from Legions but I feel like I've plateaued at 256k DPS in tooltip.

I got about 20EX to work with, any recommendations? Thank you for all the input earlier @Valkis it helped quite a bit.


i personally would dump the shield and go dual weild

also would go for mutlimoded wand

either ele to chaos tier1+multimod

or tier1 ele to chaos +crit multi/crit chance tier1 into multimod (can check my gear for example

also grab some juicy quad damage jewels

can also go for lvl 21 skill gems in 6 link setup depends on how much u wanna minmax

also theres always the ultimate chase upgrade the headhunter but its kinda pricy :D
แก้ไขล่าสุดโดย Vaikisss#3500 เมื่อ 17 ก.ค. 2019 21:30:32
"
Pilou_ เขียน:
Hi there,

Nice build, enjoying it. Quick question, why controlled destruction on spark if we play crit ? Is there a better option ?

Ty


It is a very high "more damage" multiplier, while the critchance loss is pretty insignificant. It reduces critchance only by the basecritchance, so essentially by 5%.
Hold on to yer shite load o´ bloody barnacles on me arse-cockles, me hearty!

IGN: Trapsdrubel

รายงานโพสต์

รายงานบัญชี:

ประเภทรายงาน

ข้อมูลเพิ่มเติม