"
GornoDD เขียน:
"
ismaiIYK เขียน:
passive tree still broken isnt it?
Yeah the pob-exported passive tree did have issues. So I redid it on the official site
thank u friend
แก้ไขล่าสุดโดย KaraFIRTINA#6371 เมื่อ 1 ก.ย. 2018 17:06:22
|
โพสต์โดยKaraFIRTINA#6371เมื่อ 1 ก.ย. 2018 16:55:41
|
"
SwissSh0ck เขียน:
"
GornoDD เขียน:
I did just update the passive trees and added a leveling progression picture.
The resolute-technique-thing I did ditch due to it was never really loved by anyone. Its just a minor thing actually.
Im sorry for beeing a little late to the party, but Real Life still had me good. Finally I can return to poe in full glory and will update this guide in the weeks to come.
Also I will myself return to this build an plan on improving it by alot. Still have many ideas on my radar.
we don't use 2 wildfire anymore?
You are either blind or seriously in need of specs for not seeing the two giant circles in the exact same spot. And why in the world would a molten strike build not use two wildfire?
|
โพสต์โดยdarkfear41#0513เมื่อ 1 ก.ย. 2018 20:25:32
|
"
darkfear41 เขียน:
"
SwissSh0ck เขียน:
"
GornoDD เขียน:
I did just update the passive trees and added a leveling progression picture.
The resolute-technique-thing I did ditch due to it was never really loved by anyone. Its just a minor thing actually.
Im sorry for beeing a little late to the party, but Real Life still had me good. Finally I can return to poe in full glory and will update this guide in the weeks to come.
Also I will myself return to this build an plan on improving it by alot. Still have many ideas on my radar.
we don't use 2 wildfire anymore?
You are either blind or seriously in need of specs for not seeing the two giant circles in the exact same spot. And why in the world would a molten strike build not use two wildfire?
not blind bro, the path of buildung build he linked is wrong.
|
โพสต์โดยSwissSh0ck#2791เมื่อ 2 ก.ย. 2018 06:21:25
|
"
SwissSh0ck เขียน:
"
darkfear41 เขียน:
"
SwissSh0ck เขียน:
we don't use 2 wildfire anymore?
You are either blind or seriously in need of specs for not seeing the two giant circles in the exact same spot. And why in the world would a molten strike build not use two wildfire?
not blind bro, the path of buildung build he linked is wrong.
Yes indeed, maybe he forgot to update PoB to latest version. Either way, good job not escalating this. I'll use this build in Delve as well. Gl & hf!
|
โพสต์โดยkel0o#3753เมื่อ 2 ก.ย. 2018 09:45:17
|
You are either blind or seriously in need of specs for not seeing the two giant circles in the exact same spot. And why in the world would a molten strike build not use two wildfire?[/quote]
not blind bro, the path of buildung build he linked is wrong.[/quote]
Yes indeed, maybe he forgot to update PoB to latest version. Either way, good job not escalating this. I'll use this build in Delve as well. Gl & hf![/quote]
https://pastebin.com/CKf0U6gV is this the 3.4 delve passive tree?
|
โพสต์โดยwarface9991#4458เมื่อ 2 ก.ย. 2018 11:33:31
|
Guys, what about 4-2 molten strike setup? It seems like +melee range is negatively impacted ancestral call boss setup. How do you guys feel about it?
|
โพสต์โดยValidosar#6056เมื่อ 2 ก.ย. 2018 14:43:40
|
Is it bad to use 3 Wildfire gems? Can easily get the 40 str in 3 places.
|
โพสต์โดยbrawndo89#4314เมื่อ 2 ก.ย. 2018 23:13:27
|
"
brawndo89 เขียน:
Is it bad to use 3 Wildfire gems? Can easily get the 40 str in 3 places.
Wildfire gems are limited to 2. Also, note that you don't need to get the 40str, it just have to be inside the jewel range ;).
https://pathofexile.gamepedia.com/Wildfire
|
โพสต์โดยmaster0022#0259เมื่อ 3 ก.ย. 2018 00:25:21
|
How does he manage mana degen?
I'm lvl 80 and quite often my mana runs out in a pack and I die :(
Also am a bit squishy but too poor to afford better body armor etc.
|
โพสต์โดยDeusVultz#1605เมื่อ 3 ก.ย. 2018 04:32:53
|
how did 3.4 affect this build?
nerv? buff?
im thinking to try this as starter
|
โพสต์โดยrotheee#2686เมื่อ 3 ก.ย. 2018 04:56:38
|