[3.5] CheeQu's CoC Ice Nova Assassin - Up to 7m Shaper DPS + Amazing Clearspeed [In-Depth Guide]

"
kobo1d เขียน:
I want to try my hand at crafting a good ring for the first time rather than trading, and need help deciding which crafting method would be best to get a good ring for this build. The priority list of mods is short, but the nice-to-have list is enormous.

Base(s):

• 84+ Elder Coral Rings (using Mark of the Shaper as other ring)


Highest Priorities:

• (basic) T1 Life {p}

• (basic) T1-3 Lightning Resistance {s}

• (Veiled) Shock Enemies on Focus {s}


Any of these would be great to have:

1. (Elder) Life Gain on Hit {p}

2. (Elder) Mana Gain on Hit {p}

3. (Frigid Fossil) Cold Leech {p}

4. (Elder) Fire Damage to Spells {p}

5. (basic or Essence) Increased Cold Damage {s}

6. (Prismatic Fossil) Increased Elemental Damage {s}

7. (Elder or Essence) Global Crit Multi {s}

8. (basic or Essence) ES {p}

9. (basic or Essence) Str/Dex {s}

10. (basic) All Attibutes {s}

11. (basic) Fire/Cold/Elemental/Chaos Resists {s}

And a bunch of the bench crafts would also be good options if multi-modded in future.


Alt/Regal (eventually multimod)? Alch/Chaos spam? Essence (Hatred, Sorrow, Rage, Scorn)? Fossils (Pristine, Prismatic, Frigid, Metallic, Aetheric)?



dont fuck with fossils at all. too many mods and you will waste all your currency. alt/regal is what i recommend.
"
dragnmith1 เขียน:
"
SChieco เขียน:
"
dragnmith1 เขียน:


Well most of the people in 3.7 use 14% as Cosrpri's w/o cdr reduction on belt

yes n you Still have your frostbolt below your ice nova should be the other way around like this


oh right, i'm an idiot. and what about cdr? shall i look for it in belt/boots or not? i see in ur profile u are dualwielding with cospri's AS 14% and no cdr.
i dont feel a difference with 14%cdr belt except losing tons of damage without my stygian
7.55 aps


you wont see a difference while mapping because youre hitting multiple targets. matters for single target
Well my gaming ADHD is setting in now that ive cleared all content multiple times i am going to start my next build and selling off the gear involved in this build if you need anything hit me up in game or search it on poe trade as ive went through and listed it all.


PoB: https://pastebin.com/0gX4Lq6X

สปอยล์

แก้ไขล่าสุดโดย The1ULost2#6080 เมื่อ 9 ก.ค. 2019 21:52:05
"
Cronewz เขียน:
"
vildsix เขียน:
"The MOST IMPORTANT part while figuring out our gear, is to make sure our attack speed does not exceed the CoC trigger limit. CoC can trigger a spell reliably 6.06 times per second (it has a 165ms cooldown)** (increased by the "Increased Cooldown Recovery Speed" mod of at least 14% - keep reading to see why we need at least 14%)**.?"

Still cant figure this out, what exactly this means? And can we have some example pictures with numbers?
And how much is this important? - i mean, how much less dmg we actualy do, if the cdr and attack speed are "not correct?"

Thanks.


It means, that if we proc our CoC and Malice not at the server ticks, our spells could just not be counted by the server, staying only client events. Calculation is based on 30 ticks per second. So, each tick every 33 ms. CoC gem and Malice have 150 ms cooldown, but in fact each spell procs every 5 ticks (33*5 = 165 ms) or 4 ticks (33*4 = 132 ms). To reach 132 ms threshold we need atleast 14% cooldown recovery.

The formula is:
"Cooldown time needed" = "base cooldown time" * (100 / (100 + "cooldown recovery speed increase"))

150 * 100 / 114 = almost 132 ms

1 / 0.132 = 7.57 aps

So, we need to get as much closer to this aps (with 14% CDR), but not higher.




For example with 0% CDR :
7,57 APS would result in 4 procs per second
10 APS would result in 5 procs per sec.

As a reminder, with 6 APS you have 6 procs per second.

Yo do lower your DPS by having too high APS.
"
Neronne เขียน:
"
Cronewz เขียน:
"
vildsix เขียน:
"The MOST IMPORTANT part while figuring out our gear, is to make sure our attack speed does not exceed the CoC trigger limit. CoC can trigger a spell reliably 6.06 times per second (it has a 165ms cooldown)** (increased by the "Increased Cooldown Recovery Speed" mod of at least 14% - keep reading to see why we need at least 14%)**.?"

Still cant figure this out, what exactly this means? And can we have some example pictures with numbers?
And how much is this important? - i mean, how much less dmg we actualy do, if the cdr and attack speed are "not correct?"

Thanks.


It means, that if we proc our CoC and Malice not at the server ticks, our spells could just not be counted by the server, staying only client events. Calculation is based on 30 ticks per second. So, each tick every 33 ms. CoC gem and Malice have 150 ms cooldown, but in fact each spell procs every 5 ticks (33*5 = 165 ms) or 4 ticks (33*4 = 132 ms). To reach 132 ms threshold we need atleast 14% cooldown recovery.

The formula is:
"Cooldown time needed" = "base cooldown time" * (100 / (100 + "cooldown recovery speed increase"))

150 * 100 / 114 = almost 132 ms

1 / 0.132 = 7.57 aps

So, we need to get as much closer to this aps (with 14% CDR), but not higher.




For example with 0% CDR :
7,57 APS would result in 4 procs per second
10 APS would result in 5 procs per sec.

As a reminder, with 6 APS you have 6 procs per second.

Yo do lower your DPS by having too high APS.


What about 15% CDR and 7+ APS?
"


What about 15% CDR and 7+ APS?


7+ procs.

If you have higher than 7,56 APS with more than 14% then you'll loose DPS again : i.e 10 APS with 14% CDR = 5 procs.
"
Neronne เขียน:
"


What about 15% CDR and 7+ APS?


7+ procs.

If you have higher than 7,56 APS with more than 14% then you'll loose DPS again : i.e 10 APS with 14% CDR = 5 procs.


and if 23% CDR, how much attack speed is needed?
23% CDR is equal to 14% since it isnt enough to reach the 3 tick proc rate (3×33ms).

So 7,56 APS
แก้ไขล่าสุดโดย Neronne#6251 เมื่อ 10 ก.ค. 2019 12:25:19
"
Neronne เขียน:
23% CDR is equal to 14% since it isnt enough to reach the 3 tick proc rate (3×33ms).

So 7,56 APS


I have 38% CDR, how to calculate how much need APS? Visually from 38% CDR IceNova works faster than from 14% or 20% CDR.
แก้ไขล่าสุดโดย CBuH#1165 เมื่อ 10 ก.ค. 2019 15:23:01
"
CBuH เขียน:
"
Neronne เขียน:
23% CDR is equal to 14% since it isnt enough to reach the 3 tick proc rate (3×33ms).

So 7,56 APS


I have 38% CDR, how to calculate how much need APS? Visually from 38% CDR IceNova works faster than from 14% or 20% CDR.


I would say 150 -(150 × 0,38) = 93
93 is bellow 99. It means you can procc every 3 ticks (99 ms).

APS needs to be lower than 1000÷99 = 10,1

So you can aim for 10 APS .

EDIT : THIS IS WRONG, SEE BELOW
แก้ไขล่าสุดโดย Neronne#6251 เมื่อ 11 ก.ค. 2019 03:42:05

รายงานโพสต์

รายงานบัญชี:

ประเภทรายงาน

ข้อมูลเพิ่มเติม