[3.8] Demi's Fastest Lemon: 190% Quantity Legacy MF Windripper Raider (ALL SKILLS + ALL CONTENT)

I had same problem...weird :)

But I switched Haste with Herald of Ice gems and now it is slightly better. You can do a try to see ;)

I do see now, that Herald is using for cursing enemies with Assasin's Mark, so prolly is not a good idea to do that switch :) meh!

I have just 82(with Enlighten 4) mana left from a total of 636(534 reserved) which is good for just one TS :) but still it is working fine and didn't had some problems with this low mana. Still if there is something wrong we are doing and mana can be even slightly higher, that will be good! :)
แก้ไขล่าสุดโดย spoobg#6822 เมื่อ 11 มิ.ย. 2019 12:50:53
"
spoobg เขียน:
I had same problem...weird :)

But I switched Haste with Herald of Ice gems and now it is slightly better. You can do a try to see ;)

I do see now, that Herald is using for cursing enemies with Assasin's Mark, so prolly is not a good idea to do that switch :) meh!

I have just 82(with Enlighten 4) mana left from a total of 636(534 reserved) which is good for just one TS :) but still it is working fine and didn't had some problems with this low mana. Still if there is something wrong we are doing and mana can be even slightly higher, that will be good! :)


I missed my enlighten! :) Thank you!
"
Rullmihr เขียน:
ARgh! What am I doing wrong??!

My mana reservation is at 95%!

I'm using haste which is 50%.
Herald of ice is 35% with innervate (130% multiplier) and onslaught (110% multi).
Was banner is reserving 10%.

Am I doing something wrong?


VAAL Haste. :)
Current league IGN: Teldra_Anc_LAD
Feel free to message me in game if I'm on.
"
grimjack68 เขียน:
"
Rullmihr เขียน:
ARgh! What am I doing wrong??!

My mana reservation is at 95%!

I'm using haste which is 50%.
Herald of ice is 35% with innervate (130% multiplier) and onslaught (110% multi).
Was banner is reserving 10%.

Am I doing something wrong?


VAAL Haste. :)


According Demi's videos It looks he use "Herald of Ice", "War Banner" and "Haste". He has 124 mana left.

I use this setup, have 82 mana left and its ok.
แก้ไขล่าสุดโดย Vocasek9#1919 เมื่อ 12 มิ.ย. 2019 00:36:18
"
spoobg เขียน:
Is it wrong to use Bisco in this build? I am using this one



Or maybe I should replace it with an amulet with item quantity like 20% and some offense/defensive stats?


20% rare amulet will be better than bisco !
v1tAm1n^
How does the 3.7 Immortal call affects this build? Doesn't it make it a bit more fragile?
awesome build, im doing a version of this as a league starter in 3.7! I dropped 3 doctors in 30 maps today, please dont kill me (67 IIQ + party quant from an aurabot)
"
Nasferatus เขียน:
"
spoobg เขียน:
Is it wrong to use Bisco in this build? I am using this one



Or maybe I should replace it with an amulet with item quantity like 20% and some offense/defensive stats?


20% rare amulet will be better than bisco !


You mean that it will have offensive/defensive stats which Bisco does not have?

And that:

"X% increased Rarity of Items Dropped by Slain Magic Enemies
X% increased Quantity of Items Dropped by Slain Normal Enemies"

does not help at all with this build?

Crafted today this amulet:



Not even 20% rare, but seems decent for DPS. My DPS went from like 42k to 48k unbuffed in Hideout.
แก้ไขล่าสุดโดย spoobg#6822 เมื่อ 13 มิ.ย. 2019 04:53:47
Biscos is ok, if you run a normal MF setup and not mapping that much (or just run a wannabe MF character)

Other than that it does not provide anything special.
You aim for rare/magic mobs in maps, so the quanity on biscos is not affecting all mobs.
The rarity is useless, since it does not inrease the currency mobs can drop.
Also no defense, no dps or life on it. It sounds good on first glance, but the 20% quant you can get on a amulet (standard only) is affecting all mobs in the map. So its 20% constant IIQ without any downsides.
I see, thanks for the detailed explanation on Bisco :)

รายงานโพสต์

รายงานบัญชี:

ประเภทรายงาน

ข้อมูลเพิ่มเติม