thank you rlauren2 for that very well put explanation and eased my mind into trying this for 3.11 start.
|
โพสต์โดยmuzaroni#6701เมื่อ 17 มิ.ย. 2020 20:12:22
|
"
passiontrix เขียน:
thank you rlauren2 for that very well put explanation and eased my mind into trying this for 3.11 start.
In case anyone needed any more convincing:
Video
|
โพสต์โดยrlauren2#1350เมื่อ 17 มิ.ย. 2020 20:23:56
|
"
Viktranka เขียน:
"
rlauren2 เขียน:
Now certainly if we extend for anything further than 4 seconds of constant shooting then the 3.10 duration stacker will win out. But my point is just that, in a practical sense, what appeared on paper to be a 33% loss ended up being initially a net gain in damage, and only turns into a loss after a relative eternity of ramp. A loss of 50% of the top line full ramp DPS number purely due to a loss in duration will not feel anything close to a 50% loss in real gameplay. And for most things, where stuff is dying before you even reach the top of your ramp, it won't actually be a net loss at all.
For long bosses that don't move or ones that allow you to shoot out pods before "activating", the DPS loss will be more noticeable. Losing eternal suffering does make it so that we can pick up more utility nodes like brush with death, exposure therapy, eldritch inspiration, flow of life, etc. instead for higher quality of life. Maybe me saying it will be "better" is too optimistic, but I guarantee it won't be as bad as it seems, and the survivability/QoL granted by these other nodes might actually make it feel a bit smoother in the end.
Glad to see you're optimistic, cuz it seems people are in full blown panic. If someone wants to see real nerf, check archmage and all the sources of %increased mana costs. That was harsh. Or how they flat out deleted the cluster node that have melees +1 impale.
But tbh, I'm starting to think if everyone is convinced TR is shit and strolls off to play VD necro or BV assassin then at least cheaper gear for those of us who stick with bow builds, less competition...
Yea. I dont understand why people are freaking out either. 3.10 introduced an absolute powercreep spike with cluster jewels. Every build jumped from 1 mil dps to 15 mil dps. SOme builds do 100-1 BILLION DAMAGE!!!.
3.11 comes around, it just tune it down that ridiculous dps.
Obivously, Toxic rain in 3.11 will still be better than TR in 3.9. So I dont get why people panic at all. Its like we go from 1 MIL DPS in 3.9 to 30 MIL in 3.10. Then in 3.11, we get 15 MIL DPS. Its not the end of the world people, just a balance check from GGG
|
โพสต์โดยjackietran24#7932เมื่อ 17 มิ.ย. 2020 20:50:02
|
"
rlauren2 เขียน:
"
passiontrix เขียน:
thank you rlauren2 for that very well put explanation and eased my mind into trying this for 3.11 start.
In case anyone needed any more convincing:
Video
Looks good to me. I appreciate the proof.
|
โพสต์โดยmuzaroni#6701เมื่อ 17 มิ.ย. 2020 20:57:34
|
"
rlauren2 เขียน:
"
HorizonSharp เขียน:
I tried removing some of the duration to replicate what it will be like in 3.11 and Im losing about 45-50% dps.
Not to mention the chaos dot multi nerfs on the tree.
End game will gear with synthesis implicits certainly help balance things out, but I struggle to see it being better than before.
If you have the 2 cluster setup in 3.10 you can get 3.70 second duration on your TR from 270% inc. duration (20 from ascendancy, 15 tree, 20 malevolence, 240 clusters, -25 swift affliction).
In 3.11, you go down to only 95% increased duration changing nothing (20 ascendancy, 20 tree, 20 malevolence, 60 clusters, -25 swift affliction). You could make this 115% if you use the bow big clusters with Tempered Arrowheads. Either way, that net 3.7s drop to about 2s duration is where you get the 40% DPS loss.
But this loss is only the case at full ramp. If two characters stand next to each other and each start firing, the 3.10 and 3.11 version do the same damage initially, and the 3.10 version only starts doing more damage after standing still and firing continuously for more than 2 seconds. If you need 2 seconds to ramp to 15 mil dps and, starting from nothing, fire for 4 seconds, you will pump out a total of 45 mil damage. If you need 4 seconds to ramp to 30 mil dps and, starting from nothing, fire for 4 seconds, you will pump out a total of 60 mil damage. So we see that cutting max DPS by half due solely to cutting duration doesn't actually convert to losing half your damage in practice.
And, if I'm correct about gear being easier to obtain, it might be the case that you can achieve ~33% more per pod damage, albeit for only half duration. On paper, that will still end up looking like 3.11 being 0.5*1.33 = 66% DPS of 3.10 form, or a 33% loss. However, if we do the same problem as before:
Starting from zero and needing 2 seconds to ramp to 20 mil DPS, firing for 4 seconds = 60 mil total damage done.
Starting from zero and needing 4 seconds to ramp to 30 mil DPS, firing for 4 seconds = 60 mil total damage done.
Now certainly if we extend for anything further than 4 seconds of constant shooting then the 3.10 duration stacker will win out. But my point is just that, in a practical sense, what appeared on paper to be a 33% loss ended up being initially a net gain in damage, and only turns into a loss after a relative eternity of ramp. A loss of 50% of the top line full ramp DPS number purely due to a loss in duration will not feel anything close to a 50% loss in real gameplay. And for most things, where stuff is dying before you even reach the top of your ramp, it won't actually be a net loss at all.
For long bosses that don't move or ones that allow you to shoot out pods before "activating", the DPS loss will be more noticeable. Losing eternal suffering does make it so that we can pick up more utility nodes like brush with death, exposure therapy, eldritch inspiration, flow of life, etc. instead for higher quality of life. Maybe me saying it will be "better" is too optimistic, but I guarantee it won't be as bad as it seems, and the survivability/QoL granted by these other nodes might actually make it feel a bit smoother in the end.
I see what youre saying. For 95% of content that dies in 1 second, it doesnt make a difference if your pod lasts 2 seconds or 4. And you have faster ramp.
I also didnt account for replacing those cluster jewel nodes with new dps/QOL nodes. With that and new synthesis items you may well come close to the same dps.
Either way its going to be my league starter, I tried it without the clusters and it still clears t16 easily.
I just dont see it being "better", but hopefully im wrong.
|
โพสต์โดยHorizonSharp#4959เมื่อ 17 มิ.ย. 2020 21:59:18
|
with new craft to add synthesis to implicits cant we get super high gem levels this league?
Anyone know?
|
โพสต์โดยAziah#4195เมื่อ 17 มิ.ย. 2020 22:56:18
|
This build is really nice and enjoy to play I don't know why people got panic in 3.11 ps.i'm the one that don't use any cluster jewels in 3.10 on my toxic rain build but it still strong enough to beat Sirus A8 so that's enough
|
โพสต์โดยDassort#2407เมื่อ 18 มิ.ย. 2020 03:01:26
|
Just for fun, I decided to try and min/max starting with rlauren2's triple cluster gem endgame setup. Changing out a couple cluster jewel prefixes, adding thread of hope (idea from seberus100), and building it for SC (~6000 L/ES, 75% ele resists, and 40% chaos resist), I was able to get 21M shaper dps... I think we'll be fine :). Feel free to take a look and tell me if I did anything wrong.
POB: https://pastebin.com/LPJdz36t
~Donkster5
|
โพสต์โดยDonkster5#6461เมื่อ 18 มิ.ย. 2020 15:40:23
|
"
Vibramsouls เขียน:
Feel free to take a look and tell me if I did anything wrong.
Minor nitpick, but why don't you path like this:
instead of this:
If you skip method to the madness / revenge of the hunted, you lose a point for nothing. :(
แก้ไขล่าสุดโดย Viktranka#3883 เมื่อ 18 มิ.ย. 2020 15:56:36
|
โพสต์โดยViktranka#3883เมื่อ 18 มิ.ย. 2020 15:55:53
|
Can anyone please provide a tree for the changes with the cluster jewels?
I didnt play last league and am completely overwhelmed with the cluster jewels and how i should optimize the tree.
|
โพสต์โดยnextfelipe#2647เมื่อ 18 มิ.ย. 2020 15:58:43
|