Dawn of the Hunt positive Effect on Player Count

"
Naharez#3496 เขียน:
Isn't that to be expected in games like this? People come and expect the changes to have made the game better and then realize the game is not that much different. But apparently it was different enough to make the game have 200% more players than in march.
You can stop your toxic positivity propaganda. You know very well how the numbers are and what they indicate. It was discussed many times in threads that you have already read.
That you take the 4th month of 0.1 and compare it to the start of 0.2 to make it look good with your "200% more" take shows that you are only interested in transforming the narrative into something better than it is.
[Removed by Support]
"
JakkerONAIR#4902 เขียน:
"
Naharez#3496 เขียน:
Isn't that to be expected in games like this? People come and expect the changes to have made the game better and then realize the game is not that much different. But apparently it was different enough to make the game have 200% more players than in march.
You can stop your toxic positivity propaganda. You know very well how the numbers are and what they indicate. It was discussed many times in threads that you have already read.
That you take the 4th month of 0.1 and compare it to the start of 0.2 to make it look good with your "200% more" take shows that you are only interested in transforming the narrative into something better than it is.


Sure, I have to admit you have a point there. Still my conclusion stands.
"
Naharez#3496 เขียน:
"
JakkerONAIR#4902 เขียน:
"
Naharez#3496 เขียน:
Isn't that to be expected in games like this? People come and expect the changes to have made the game better and then realize the game is not that much different. But apparently it was different enough to make the game have 200% more players than in march.
You can stop your toxic positivity propaganda. You know very well how the numbers are and what they indicate. It was discussed many times in threads that you have already read.
That you take the 4th month of 0.1 and compare it to the start of 0.2 to make it look good with your "200% more" take shows that you are only interested in transforming the narrative into something better than it is.


Sure, I have to admit you have a point there. Still my conclusion stands.


By your own admission, no it doesn't. I'm dying laughing.

"Alright, you got me...but you're still wrong!" XD
"
Redthorne82#3177 เขียน:

By your own admission, no it doesn't. I'm dying laughing.

"Alright, you got me...but you're still wrong!" XD


What do you mean? My conclusion was that content patches and reworks of existing systems are what GGG should focus on, because it has the biggest effect on player count.

That is still true, even if I agree the patch could've done better.
แก้ไขล่าสุดโดย Naharez#3496 เมื่อ 3 พ.ค. 2025 02:02:47

รายงานโพสต์

รายงานบัญชี:

ประเภทรายงาน

ข้อมูลเพิ่มเติม