Warrior nerfs just don't make sense
|
I'm hoping GGG comes out this week with some information that makes the warrior changes feel better... or at least make more sense.
Maybe they added +life% nodes or something to the tree... but I'd be very surprised if that were true -- VERY surprised. I'm finding the reveal disingenuous in saying that every class was buffed. It doesn't seem like that for Smith of Kitava. Our only recourse is maybe some left-side love for the passive tree. I mean this graphic (still on the website) clearly says "All Classes Buffed"  Is that really true? Honestly it should have a little asterisk (*) with a disclaimer at the bottom. * GGG makes no guarantee of any kind, express or implied, regarding the accuracy, adequacy, validity, reliability, availability or completeness of any information provided. แก้ไขล่าสุดโดย Kozikuru#3127 เมื่อ 23 ส.ค. 2025 19:15:09
|
|
|
I think they genuinely believe that making block work on aoe skills is a buff. Even though it came with a downside to 50% max block now. If you looked at that first line in a vacuum you can justify that as a buff. You just cant consider the rest of the changes.
|
|
" Technically by "class" they mean Warrior, Ranger, etc. Now of course Smith is a Warrior, but so is Warbringer and Titan. Titan is pretty much untouched (the ascendancy itself) and Warbringer is buffed afaik. So technically they are still not lying I guess? :D |
|
