You do not mention about elemental penetration on weapons. Does elemental penetration on weapon not apply to mine?
|
โพสต์โดยfangfang830617#4158เมื่อ 15 ก.ย. 2019 12:15:17
|
Can you give some samples of cheap version of this build? Because my budget now its only ~70 chaos
|
โพสต์โดยEtoVitya#1577เมื่อ 15 ก.ย. 2019 12:21:15
|
Anyone know if the new +1 all cold gems on wands would help the damage more than another prefix/suffix. Could get +2 from dual wands or +3 from staff.
|
โพสต์โดยNamper#2171เมื่อ 15 ก.ย. 2019 13:07:13
|
"
lostrase เขียน:
Dude try Voidwalker boots (5 target pierce while you have phasing + phasing on kill) and shape ring with assassin mark on hit is too good improvement for critical build.
How does this work since its the mines doing the killing and not you?
|
โพสต์โดยdiem4801#7747เมื่อ 15 ก.ย. 2019 13:54:29
|
"
Namper เขียน:
Anyone know if the new +1 all cold gems on wands would help the damage more than another prefix/suffix. Could get +2 from dual wands or +3 from staff.
I tried with +5 gems (+3 cold +2 all gems) on a staff and got about the same result as the wands I'm using now.
|
โพสต์โดยMemoria_Gaming#6536เมื่อ 15 ก.ย. 2019 17:07:14
|
"
diem4801 เขียน:
"
lostrase เขียน:
Dude try Voidwalker boots (5 target pierce while you have phasing + phasing on kill) and shape ring with assassin mark on hit is too good improvement for critical build.
How does this work since its the mines doing the killing and not you?
Yeah you're right, I'm pretty sure it doesn't work since "You" need to get the kill, so the voidwalker idea is pretty much void.
|
โพสต์โดยMemoria_Gaming#6536เมื่อ 15 ก.ย. 2019 17:07:49
|
"
Memoria_Gaming เขียน:
"
diem4801 เขียน:
Is there a benefit in using pierce support over piercing shots in the tree? Seems like you could include a better support gem, ive used both so far and two additional enemies pierced seems to be more than plenty. I dont have a 6s yet so its hard to gauge how much better it would be.
Higher number of pierces, but that's about it.
He meant taking Piercing shots node (+2 pierce) and replace Pierce support with other support for more damage. Isn't a good idea?
|
โพสต์โดยFedeS#7818เมื่อ 15 ก.ย. 2019 21:40:10
|
Hi. What about bonechill support on the skitterbots?
|
โพสต์โดยVickery#2199เมื่อ 16 ก.ย. 2019 03:58:31
|
"
FedeS เขียน:
"
Memoria_Gaming เขียน:
"
diem4801 เขียน:
Is there a benefit in using pierce support over piercing shots in the tree? Seems like you could include a better support gem, ive used both so far and two additional enemies pierced seems to be more than plenty. I dont have a 6s yet so its hard to gauge how much better it would be.
Higher number of pierces, but that's about it.
He meant taking Piercing shots node (+2 pierce) and replace Pierce support with other support for more damage. Isn't a good idea?
That's what I meant, I swapped out Pierce with chain and went with Piercing shots instead, so it's a good idea :)
|
โพสต์โดยMemoria_Gaming#6536เมื่อ 16 ก.ย. 2019 04:29:48
|
"
Vickery เขียน:
Hi. What about bonechill support on the skitterbots?
Yeah it could work, good idea.
|
โพสต์โดยMemoria_Gaming#6536เมื่อ 16 ก.ย. 2019 04:30:26
|