Everyone going DEADEYE again.

It's an underpowered ascendacy, let's buff it even more in 0.3 despite it's the highest played ascendacy in the whole game for 9 months.

Anyhow, looking at the polls and stuff, insane amount of people going deadeye again. Thanks for this amazing experience GGG. I would like the hear the reason about why deadeye must be the most op and safest choice of ascendacy in the game?
ขุดครั้งสุดท้าย เมื่อ 24 ส.ค. 2025 09:07:49
i actually heard that most are going chonk or stormweaver but how is this going to affect your game experience?
Can i have a link with most played class graph, cant find one up to date, i was curious to check because i saw more amazon and bloodmage than deadeye.
แก้ไขล่าสุดโดย IILU81II#8410 เมื่อ 23 ส.ค. 2025 08:36:48
"
IILU81II#8410 เขียน:
i actually heard that most are going chonk or stormweaver but how is this going to affect your game experience?
Can i have a link with most played class graph, cant find one up to date, i was curious to check because i saw more amazon and bloodmage than deadeye.



They didnt nerf enough spear. Warrior class was nerfed to the bone.. Only Gemling has potetional but with no Galvanic shards is doomed.
"
Albibu#9602 เขียน:
"
IILU81II#8410 เขียน:
i actually heard that most are going chonk or stormweaver but how is this going to affect your game experience?
Can i have a link with most played class graph, cant find one up to date, i was curious to check because i saw more amazon and bloodmage than deadeye.



They didnt nerf enough spear. Warrior class was nerfed to the bone.. Only Gemling has potetional but with no Galvanic shards is doomed.


Just wait to see the tree before announcing disaster, i'm going tactician again and i'm pretty sure it will be better than 0.2
If someone pick deadeye or whatever they want to i dont really see the problem.
You like meta? play meta
I dont like meta and play whatever fits my playstyle no matter what.
i will level up 10 or more character again and have fun messing with weird things.

Also this galvanic shard and the 1 bolt catastrophy, i was playing maps with permafrost bolt and use galvanic shard only to shock bosses then shockburst round on my WH.

It just needs 1 or 2 hits to shock a pinnacle and then shockburst round does the rest if this was your combo.
I went siege cascade for most of the league and it was op with 3 bolts, really 6 days left and we can talk about whats good and whats bad.
แก้ไขล่าสุดโดย IILU81II#8410 เมื่อ 23 ส.ค. 2025 08:56:47
it is not that deadeye is op , its not
but people like the extra run speed extra attack speed and extra arrow
and that the class starts in area where u can take alot of run speed .
many other classes provide allot more damage
"
it is not that deadeye is op , its not


Did you read the patch notes? Deadeye got buffed. Evasion got buffed. Lightning rod got buffed. Can get +7 extra arrows now. That's just stupid OP.
"
FPSPV#4195 เขียน:
"
it is not that deadeye is op , its not


Did you read the patch notes? Deadeye got buffed. Evasion got buffed. Lightning rod got buffed. Can get +7 extra arrows now. That's just stupid OP.


not only dead eye using evasion
not only deadeye uses lighting rod
+ 7 arrows ? gl doing that
I am going: Invoker, Chayula, Deadeye and Witchhunter by the end.

It is a 4 months league. I am sure you can play more than 1 toon, especially if an amazing item drops that makes you go a different class to take advantage from it.
"
ThreeBelowZero#2968 เขียน:
I am going: Invoker, Chayula, Deadeye and Witchhunter by the end.

It is a 4 months league. I am sure you can play more than 1 toon, especially if an amazing item drops that makes you go a different class to take advantage from it.


yea i usualy make 4-5 chars per league there is plenty of time for that seasons are very long
What makes deadeye too op is that the ascendacy is too flexible. You can literally play almost any build with it. Almost everything fits the ascendacy.

They need to somehow limit this ascendacy to bows/crossbow only or something and remove movement speed boost.

รายงานโพสต์

รายงานบัญชี:

ประเภทรายงาน

ข้อมูลเพิ่มเติม