Endgame has too many monsters that die too fast. Zooming is boring.

"

Nikuksis#6962 เขียน:

I loved "the vision" and hope they will stay at this.

Sorry for your loss but the vision has died and I'm thrilled it did.

Someone still advocating for "the vision" at this point is actively seeking the complete ruination of this game and destroying GGG great reputation.

The feedbacks were ATROCIOUS when 0.2 came out and it was moving toward what you call "the vision". Most players now feel good with 0.3. I was supposed just to log in to check act 4 then delete the game. But I didn't because they saved it.

"

MadSheo#0280 เขียน:

I agree. If this game becomes just zoom-zoom i might play for some time but its gonna get boring pretty fast. I am all for meaningful combat and expect some big changes for endgame in 0.4.

People who are NOT fans of Fubgun gaming style need to make their voices heard.

more like in 4.0 then. Because if you change the pace of combat, you would need to change the complete endgame from the ground up. From item acquisition to mapsize, packsize, monster mods and meta play (currently only the atlas). ALL of those are tailored to max 10 min map clear to feel comfortable to progress.

but that won't happen, well maybe, if ggg enjoys ruthless player numbers. There is also another game, no rest for the wicked, which already does that DS like iso arpg angle. go play that if thats more your alley. or just play the campaign... well no, just play the first 2-3 acts or so because afterwards you may get some tech off the ground to clear fast.

"

tsunamikun#0433 เขียน:

you would need to change the complete endgame from the ground up. From item acquisition to mapsize, packsize, monster mods and meta play (currently only the atlas).

Its a matter of few balance changes

"

tsunamikun#0433 เขียน:

but that won't happen, well maybe, if ggg enjoys ruthless player numbers.

Do not refer to ruthless online numbers, since its 1. not default game mode 2. has limited content comparing to regular trade league 3. appeared at the game state when people who like slower game already don't even look at PoE.

Anyways i'm looking forward for ruthless PoE2 league then. If not then at least they add PL mods to make it yourself.

"

Nikuksis#6962 เขียน:

Do not refer to ruthless online numbers, since its 1

I mean, it's not only 1 player but close. (Hi Kripparrian)

The "mercenary gameplay walkthrough" video was what poe 2 should have been

That version of the game died when they decided to rush the process and make endgame in only 3 months, that forever changed what poe 2 was supposed to be

RIP

"

Vyend#2601 เขียน:

RIP

It's for the best. You should celebrate the death of the vision.
If they keep moving the needle the way they are doing right now, this will be the best game to have ever been made in history.

0.3 is fantastic

"

Oinkaments#6390 เขียน:

"

Nikuksis#6962 เขียน:

the maps are way too similar to PoE1 with way overtuned packsize even on low level maps with no mods

That's fantastic. 98% of the players appreciate that.

"

Nikuksis#6962 เขียน:

Making the game as zoomy as PoE1 makes it just bad copy of PoE1

I very very much disagree with you. I haven't played POE 1 in over 6 years and I'm loving POE 2 and I never want a slow paced game in it when it comes to XP/loot grinding in maps. This would absolutely destroy the fun for me.


0.3 is going in the right direction and the devs knows. Look at the feedbacks. It's clear as day

"

Oinkaments#6390 เขียน:

Just look at the steam recent reviews and most players leave very good feedbacks. I changed my doomsday feedback of 0.2 to a positive feedback after the 4th day 0.3 was online.

So you just presented your personal feelings as facts and admitted that you just blackmailed developers with bad review to cater to your taste, nice.

"

Oinkaments#6390 เขียน:

There are thousands of games your friend can play. Don't destroy one of the best game in the world because you like different games.

You're sending the guy to play other games if he doesn't want zooming, but where should he go? Literally every other "modern" arpg does this, why don't you go play these games? You sound like hypocrite with that one, knowing what original vision for poe2 was.

GGG is finetuning the game and you can't truly know what is happening behind the scenes, what if this patch is mistake in their eyes?

They stated that they wanted to make it different than every other arpg on the market and you're just blackmailing them so they don't try it, congratulations - you're truly a friend of innovation and self-discovery.

"

Oinkaments#6390 เขียน:

Only fools don't change their minds.

I wonder who wants to play the same game over and over, hmm.

If they make it zooming again, sure the poe1 zooming bubble will love it, but it will be a laughing stock for early arpg fans, and there is way more of them than you think.

"

Niszczyciel#1619 เขียน:

So you just presented your personal feelings as facts and admitted that you just blackmailed developers with bad review to cater to your taste, nice.

How is giving an honest review based on the experience I'm having black mailing? This is some new level of unseen cope/reach.

"

Niszczyciel#1619 เขียน:

Literally every other "modern" arpg does this

I'm glad you finally understand that this is the way to go and that the companies understand what players want and that they won't listen to a small very loud minority.

"

Niszczyciel#1619 เขียน:

You sound like hypocrite with that one, knowing what original vision for poe2 was.

You are filled with hate, and this hate seems to stem from the fact that people love 0.3. If you want to blame GGG for not sticking to their vision, you do you, but they were very smart to kill it. The game is now fantastic.

"

Niszczyciel#1619 เขียน:

GGG is finetuning the game and you can't truly know what is happening behind the scenes, what if this patch is mistake in their eyes?

Oh yeah, I'm sure that they think this patch was a mistake after it received praise from a lot of players. Again, you are trying so hard and reaching.

"

Niszczyciel#1619 เขียน:

They stated that they wanted to make it different than every other arpg on the market and you're just blackmailing them so they don't try it, congratulations - you're truly a friend of innovation and self-discovery.

You forgot to edit that part to hide the fact it came from a chatGPT prompt. What was the initial narrative? You should construct your prompt better because this rage baiting post is 1/10

"

Niszczyciel#1619 เขียน:

I wonder who wants to play the same game over and over, hmm.

Path of Exile player base. It's called league with new mechanics and added stuff. If you want a live gacha service there are plenty of those, don't you have a mobile?

"

Niszczyciel#1619 เขียน:

If they make it zooming again, sure the poe1 zooming bubble will love it, but it will be a laughing stock for early arpg fans, and there is way more of them than you think.

That's your opinion, but that opinion dosen't find any serious ground in the path of exile community.

"

Vyend#2601 เขียน:

The "mercenary gameplay walkthrough" video was what poe 2 should have been

That version of the game died when they decided to rush the process and make endgame in only 3 months, that forever changed what poe 2 was supposed to bne

RIP

Yeah that video is great. The way it looks now its just a different game.

It reminds me teasers of Diablo 3 when it was in development. It also has a lot of great ideas and mechanics, which were killed by the marketing team of blizzard, and look where diablo 3 now (and where it already was after the RoS expansion released).
They added campaign skip for everyone, they added those 9678309456781239084751023 damage numbers and zooming through the game, and this result in dead game. Would be sad if this happen again for PoE2.

"

Oinkaments#6390 เขียน:

"

Niszczyciel#1619 เขียน:

They stated that they wanted to make it different than every other arpg on the market and you're just blackmailing them so they don't try it, congratulations - you're truly a friend of innovation and self-discovery.

You forgot to edit that part to hide the fact it came from a chatGPT prompt. What was the initial narrative? You should construct your prompt better because this rage baiting post is 1/10

I don't know what you mean, I'm not native to english and I might make some mistakes, but this doesn't come from chat gpt.

The rest of your post is basically random rumbling so there is no point responding.